Share from Insight-live.com (Lab Documentation and Calculation System) by Digitalfire. https://digitalfire.com
Worthington Cone 06-2 Clear Gelling, High LOI, Gerstley Borate difficult to sub, High Boron
Total:100.00 Auto Unity Formula
Notes *This recipe is a common Gerstley Borate clear base used from 04 all the way to cone 6! At higher temperatures the recipe trends toward less kaolin to more silica and a little less GB (e.g. 50:20:30). Pictures Worthinton Clear at cone 01 On a terra cotta clay at this temperature was has stoneware properties. The fired surface is good. Worthington Clear vs. Fritted Clear Worthington (right) flows even better than the fritted glaze and does not have any more entrained bubbles even though it has an LOI of 20%. This is likely because its melting history and behavior is such that its ability handle gases of decomposition from the body and its own materials is so much better. 2931 vs 2931b On Plainsman L215 cone 02 the original base Worthington Clear has gone on very thin on sides of mug (because of the low specific gravity necessary to prevent it from gelling it is very difficult to get it on thick enough). The fired surface is clear but not as glossy. On the rim it has bubbles. The Ulexite version (G2931B) is glossier, and went on thicker because the slurry is so much easier to use. This glaze is not recommend for L215, the latter contains talc that increases its thermal expansion, putting too much squeeze on this glaze. Entrained bubbles in Worthington Clear This is a 16X closeup of flow test (10 gram ball melted down onto a tile) that concentrates bubbles. There are high populations of large and tiny ones. The larger ones are from the Gerstley Borate, the tiny ones from the kaolin. GB vs Ulexite Clear glaze bubbles These are 10 gram balls fired down onto tiles at cone 04 to compare melt fluidity and bubble populations in three clear glazes. Larger bubbles are better, they break at the glaze surface and heal. Tiny ones produce cloudiness. Worthington Clear the next day Even though this has a low specific gravity and is deflocculated with darvan, the next day it is still jelly. Impossible to use unless more Darvan is added, who knows where that will go! G2922G, G2931 flow tests Testdata SHAB - Shrinkage/Absorption
LDW - LOI/Density/Water Content
XML (to paste into Insight) <?xml version="1.0"?> <recipes version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"> <recipe name="Worthington Cone 06-2 Clear" keywords="Gelling, High LOI, Gerstley Borate difficult to sub, High Boron" id="56711" key="MPEeRhAY" date="2023-04-13" codenum="G2931" picturebasename=""> <recipelines> <recipeline material="Gerstley Borate" amount="55.000" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="EPK" amount="30.000" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Silica" amount="15.000" tolerance=""/> </recipelines> </recipe> </recipes> Born: 2014-03-17, Modified: 2023-04-13 22:30:05 |
Low Expansion Zero3 Clear
Total:99.80 Auto Unity Formula
Notes *This is a lower expansion version of G2931K, an ultra-clear for porcelain and talc bodies at low fire. This sacrifices some surface brilliance for the low thermal expansion. The chemistry of this recipe cannot be produced using common frits, the Ulexite is essential (to source the high boron). Pictures Ulexite Worthington clear cone 02 This is a terra cotta stoneware body, the body contains enough frit to produce 1% porosity at cone 02. Although it appears to work well, it is under too much compression because its thermal expansion is too low. We noted a tendency to shiver on the rims of mugs, especially with the white engobe present. Worthington Original vs. Ulexite varitation flow test Gas generation during melt is obviously more active in the Gerstley Borate version (left) than in the Ulexite version (right). This is fired to cone 03. Ulexite Worthington Clear to cone 02 No pinholes, thin application. Some bubbles. This was fired to temperature and soak 10 minutes (and cool of 100 degrees and soak there would have yielded even better results). Cone 03 and 02 do produce a more brilliant result than cone 04. 2931 vs 2931b On Plainsman L215 cone 02 the original base Worthington Clear has gone on very thin on sides of mug (because of the low specific gravity necessary to prevent it from gelling it is very difficult to get it on thick enough). The fired surface is clear but not as glossy. On the rim it has bubbles. The Ulexite version (G2931B) is glossier, and went on thicker because the slurry is so much easier to use. This glaze is not recommend for L215, the latter contains talc that increases its thermal expansion, putting too much squeeze on this glaze. Entrained bubbles in Ulexite Worthington 16x photo of a 10 gram glaze ball melted down onto a tile, it was fired to cone 03. This has both the large and small bubbles populations. GB vs Ulexite Clear glaze bubbles These are 10 gram balls fired down onto tiles at cone 04 to compare melt fluidity and bubble populations in three clear glazes. Larger bubbles are better, they break at the glaze surface and heal. Tiny ones produce cloudiness. G2931B and F fit different bodies The fritted vitreous body on the left shivers using G2931B. The same body (having the same white slip (G3685U) does not shiver the G2931F version of the glaze (it has more KNaO). Links with Schedules To: Cone 03 hold-rise-drop-hold XML (to paste into Insight) <?xml version="1.0"?> <recipes version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"> <recipe name="Low Expansion Zero3 Clear" id="56872" key="f94tZS7K" date="2017-06-08" codenum="G2931B" picturebasename=""> <recipelines> <recipeline material="EPK" amount="25.100" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Silica" amount="10.600" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Ulexite" amount="26.500" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Ferro Frit 3249" amount="16.900" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Wollastonite" amount="15.500" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Nepheline Syenite" amount="5.200" tolerance=""/> </recipelines> </recipe> </recipes> Born: 2014-03-19, Modified: 2017-06-08 21:20:13 |