Share from Insight-live.com (Lab Documentation and Calculation System) by Digitalfire. https://digitalfire.com
Is it practical to try to make stoneware at cone 1? Let's find out using two very different approaches.
Red Art Cone 1 Clay Body
Total:102.50 Notes *Very smooth. Pictures Freshly thrown mugs L4163 SHAB, DFAC, LDW specimens have dried L4163 fired at cone 1 - No glaze L4163 Red Art Cone 1 Body fired DFAC disk Bars fired at cone 1, 3, 4 (bottom to top) Actually the bottom bar did not quite get to cone 1 (about 0.5). L4163 fired bars Fired from cone 5 (top) down to cone 02 (bottom). Testdata SHAB - Shrinkage/Absorption
SOLU - Soluble Salts
DFAC - Drying Factor
LDW - LOI/Density/Water Content
XML (to paste into Insight) <?xml version="1.0"?> <recipes version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"> <recipe name="Red Art Cone 1 Clay Body" id="152959" key="dJjNdXK7" date="2022-12-07" codenum="L4163"> <recipelines> <recipeline material="Redart" amount="60.000" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="OM4" amount="30.000" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Talc" amount="10.000" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Bentonite" amount="2.000" tolerance=""/> <recipeline material="Iron Oxide Red" amount="0.500" added="true"/> </recipelines> </recipe> </recipes> Born: 2019-03-20, Modified: 2022-12-07 20:24:18 |
L215 : M390 Mix for Cone 1 Stoneware
Notes *This is a 50:50 mix of Plainsman low temperature L215 terra cotta body and medium temperature M390. The idea was that a mix of a cone 04 body and a cone 6 body would mature mid way between those temperatures. However the L215 did not lower the range of M390 as much as was expected. The body reached a dense stoneware maturity (as indicated by 2% porosity) at around cone 3.5. The 3% porosity it achieves at cone 2.5 is still very durable and we found it worked well with the G3806N recipe (a melt fluid glaze for cone 6 but that is still melting well at cone 2.5). Pictures Testdata SHAB - Shrinkage/Absorption
XML (to paste into Insight) Born: 2020-06-08, Modified: 2022-12-07 20:23:39 |